Subject	Okay, fine. We all pay for conveniences. What is reasonable
Posted by	Guapo on September 15, 2004 at 11:02 PM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	Actually, if nobody bitches about the price, it is probably posted by olyar15 on September 15, 2004 at 10:50 PM
Message	for one person is not reasonable for the next person. To go back to the Starbucks analogy, If they were selling simple Folgers drip coffee for $4 a cup, do you think anyone would buy it? No. They sell a product you cannot duplicate in your home for a reasonable cost (of time or money). I simply point out that IMO $30 for that boost leak checker is out of line,when making one is so simple. Now that he has lowered his price to a more reasonable level (IMO), I've got no issue. If I didn't feel like making my own for $3, I'd gladly pay $12 for the convenience of his. And thanks to Guapo... I got my first ride in a Twinturbo... at speed... on a race track. I'll just say 'Damn' and leave it at that.- Tu 09/13/04 12:03:59
Follow Ups	I don't get it. - chris@boostpro.net 21:42:55 09/15/04 I like the name change - MyZ8u 21:50:51 09/15/04 While your efforts are appreciated, your implimentation - Guapo 21:52:26 09/15/04 correction .. put not infront of just a businessman. (n/m) - chris@boostpro.net 22:05:27 09/15/04 So how do you explain Starbucks? - olyar15 22:23:51 09/15/04 how you maknig coffeee for less than $1? - dogpile 22:28:15 09/15/04 Damn you and your logic! - xtensive 22:32:26 09/15/04 7-11 $0.99 coffee $$$ (n/m) - MarkA(NoVA) 22:49:09 09/15/04 thats not making it himself (n/m) - dogpile 22:57:23 09/15/04 Are you being sarcastic??? You're so far off... - SooperZ95 02:17:37 09/16/04 Wow. - AbnormallyAspirated 03:03:24 09/16/04 its not $1 right off the bat - dogpile 04:57:38 09/16/04 Do people bitch about the prices at Starbucks? - Guapo 22:32:40 09/15/04 Actually, if nobody bitches about the price, it is probably - olyar15 22:50:18 09/15/04 "no need for pizza delievery"????? - dogpile 22:59:23 09/15/04 Okay, fine. We all pay for conveniences. What is reasonable - Guapo 23:02:15 09/15/04 What the hell kind of reasoning is that? - CaptK(ATL) 23:23:14 09/15/04 ding (n/m) - Spee 23:24:59 09/15/04 I thought I just said that? :) (n/m) - Guapo 09:01:32 09/16/04 *cough* - Fuzznutz 00:07:15 09/16/04 Re: *cough* - Guapo 08:59:32 09/16/04 Then why don't you start - Fuzznutz 11:35:08 09/16/04 Re: While your efforts are appreciated, your implimentation - Dustin 21:25:44 09/16/04 Just goes to show you, everybody wants somethin' for nuthin' - RAGTPZ(OH) 23:16:59 09/15/04 ?? (n/m) - Spee 23:21:24 09/15/04 Meaning that people were flaming him for 'ripping' people - RAGTPZ(OH) 08:42:51 09/16/04 I agree with you 100% - Spee 14:20:29 09/16/04 I couldn't agree more! - ZEngineer (TT) 12:39:28 09/16/04 .... (n/m) - Spee 17:05:59 09/16/04 so give him $30 for one. (n/m) - Guapo 23:06:11 09/16/04 sigh (n/m) - aliaZ (broken in) 23:09:34 09/16/04 You are right, you don't get it. As a business man - AzHeat 02:06:52 09/16/04 wrong fittings? ive used my fitting 100x - chris@boostpro.net 04:33:47 09/16/04 Your 4 p's are wrong: product, price, promotion and place. (n/m) - JeffZTT (ATL) 09:52:55 09/16/04 My class it was packaging as one of the p's. Promotion - AzHeat 10:51:12 09/16/04 Wow. - Dustin 20:52:57 09/16/04 What's to construct, I made mine for $4 . Yes, at - AzHeat 01:53:43 09/17/04 I was tring to reply to your post below - maglito 02:39:48 09/16/04 as a manufacturer i can tell you a few things... - Ted(Snowflake Customs) 05:08:22 09/16/04 the reason for the patent is that down the road - chris@boostpro.net 05:46:13 09/16/04 have you thought of doing something along the lines... - Ted(Snowflake Customs) 05:58:20 09/16/04 in order for you to be able to get a patent - aliaZ (broken in) 07:06:47 09/16/04 Re: in order for you to be able to get a patent - Dustin 21:34:58 09/16/04 right - aliaZ (broken in) 22:59:53 09/16/04 Water flavors are usually tradmarked, not patented. - Dustin 06:58:04 09/17/04 you missed my point entirely - aliaZ (broken in) 08:10:01 09/17/04 Re: you missed my point entirely - Dustin 09:25:00 09/17/04 I see you're fom Tulsa - aliaZ (broken in) 08:11:56 09/17/04 I haven't yet. One of these years I will. - Dustin 09:28:15 09/17/04 Re: Re: in order for you to be able to get a patent - aliaZ (broken in) 08:31:15 09/17/04 Re: Re: Re: in order for you to be able to get a patent - Dustin 10:30:29 09/17/04 You have no idea how the patent system works. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 09:02:14 09/16/04 thats why the family lawyer is doing it... did i mention - chris@boostpro.net 14:26:51 09/16/04 Right, good luck w. that. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 20:58:08 09/16/04 2nd (n/m) - aliaZ (broken in) 22:58:24 09/16/04 lol...you're a naive kid (n/m) - aliaZ (broken in) 22:58:58 09/16/04 2rd (n/m) - Spee 23:47:18 09/16/04 The time/money involved at this point would negate profits - Renner 11:45:30 09/17/04 I think you are right on target. Follow your instincts. - Gordo 93TT NYC 06:56:11 09/16/04 Maybe if he started with a product that couldn't - AzHeat 10:57:08 09/16/04 Agreed; but that should not elicit such a negative response - Gordo 93TT NYC 15:13:44 09/16/04 2nd (n/m) - Dustin 07:56:16 09/17/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.